DotNetNewsgroup.com  
web access to complete list of Microsoft.NET newsgroups
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive  |  
 
  carried group
academic
adonet
aspnet
aspnet.announcements
aspnet.buildingcontrols
aspnet.caching
aspnet.datagridcontrol
aspnet.mobile
aspnet.security
aspnet.webcontrols
aspnet.webservices
assignment_manager
datatools
dotnet.distributed_apps
dotnet.general
dotnet.myservices
dotnet.nternationalization
dotnet.scripting
dotnet.security
dotnet.vjsharp
dotnet.vsa
dotnet.xml
dotnetfaqs
framework
framework.clr
framework.compactframework
framework.component_services
framework.controls
framework.databinding
framework.drawing
framework.enhancements
framework.interop
framework.odbcnet
framework.performance
framework.remoting
framework.sdk
framework.setup
framework.webservices
framework.windowsforms
framework.wmi
frwk.windowsforms.designtime
lang.csharp
lang.jscript
lang.vb
lang.vb.controls
lang.vb.data
lang.vb.upgrade
lang.vc
lang.vc.libraries
  
 
start date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:24:27 -0700,    posted on: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet        back       

Thread Index
  1    am
          2    Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]
                 3    Mark Rae [MVP]
                        4    am
                               5    Mark Rae [MVP]
          6    Mark Rae [MVP]


web hosting limits: ways in ASP.NET to allow connection to remote database systems?   
I recently signed up for shared web hosting with a commercial hosting 
service (GoDaddy.com) and was awed to discover that although a generous SQL 
Server database package is included, there is not an easy way to connect 
ASP.NET web applications to database servers running outside of the host's 
systems. Indeed, many ports are blocked: I think the only open ports are 80 
and 25.

Surely there is some way around this that I could manage in programming 
and/or via infrastructure magic. I'm running SQL Server 2005 on both ends, 
and have total control over the server/db server on my end.

Can someone suggest if there is a viable approach to somehow "wrap" database 
calls in a way that isn't totally slow and a total mess to work with?  Does 
the .NET platform anticipate this kind of problem and have anything 
prebuilt?

Thanks for any ideas. The best answer will probably be to have all of my 
apps and database stuff encapsulated on my host, but there's some testing 
that needs to happen between now and final deployment, and I'd prefer to 
have my database wired up for now.

-KF
Date:Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:24:27 -0700   Author:  

RE: web hosting limits: ways in ASP.NET to allow connection to remote   
I am afraid that the solution here is to dump godaddy.com and find another 
hoster. It didn't take me more than 10 minutes to dump them when I found out 
I could not even make an HTTPWebRequest from the site I deployed due to their 
ridiculous restrictions.

For a comparable deal on pricing and features, without the stupid 
restrictions, you can try Gate.com or Crystaltech.com
Peter
-- 
Recursion: see Recursion
site:  http://www.eggheadcafe.com
unBlog:  http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
bogMetaFinder:    http://www.blogmetafinder.com



"kenfine@nospam.nospam" wrote:


> 
> I recently signed up for shared web hosting with a commercial hosting 
> service (GoDaddy.com) and was awed to discover that although a generous SQL 
> Server database package is included, there is not an easy way to connect 
> ASP.NET web applications to database servers running outside of the host's 
> systems. Indeed, many ports are blocked: I think the only open ports are 80 
> and 25.
> 
> Surely there is some way around this that I could manage in programming 
> and/or via infrastructure magic. I'm running SQL Server 2005 on both ends, 
> and have total control over the server/db server on my end.
> 
> Can someone suggest if there is a viable approach to somehow "wrap" database 
> calls in a way that isn't totally slow and a total mess to work with?  Does 
> the .NET platform anticipate this kind of problem and have anything 
> prebuilt?
> 
> Thanks for any ideas. The best answer will probably be to have all of my 
> apps and database stuff encapsulated on my host, but there's some testing 
> that needs to happen between now and final deployment, and I'd prefer to 
> have my database wired up for now.
> 
> -KF
> 
> 
> 
> 
Date:Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:24:01 -0700   Author:  

Re: web hosting limits: ways in ASP.NET to allow connection to remote   
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]"  wrote 
in message news:9AF9718C-F06D-454D-8170-39FDA7840555@microsoft.com...


>I am afraid that the solution here is to dump godaddy.com and find another
> hoster. It didn't take me more than 10 minutes to dump them when I found 
> out
> I could not even make an HTTPWebRequest from the site I deployed due to 
> their
> ridiculous restrictions.


Absolutely! I've never known any developer with a good word to say about 
this ISP...


-- 
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Date:Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:29:17 +0100   Author:  

Re: web hosting limits: ways in ASP.NET to allow connection to remote database systems?   
<kenfine@nospam.nospam> wrote in message 
news:e1$VDix1HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...


> Surely there is some way around this


Not so long as you continue to use GoDaddy...


-- 
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Date:Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:57:02 +0100   Author:  

Re: web hosting limits: ways in ASP.NET to allow connection to remote   
Thanks again, guys. I didn't know about those, and yes, they matter quite a 
bit for our work.

I will say a few good words about GoDaddy based on my experiences with them 
over the last year. GoDaddy has been a very reliable host, and their 
customer service is responsive. Their online tools are reasonably intuitive. 
I like their FAQ and their prices are excellent.

That all said the shared hosting seems best for "dumb" deployments of static 
content. The restrictions make life very difficult for any kind of advanced 
deployment that involves your application communicating with other places. 
The inability to connect to SQL Server databases via Enterprise manager is 
not a show-stopper, but it makes life much, much harder than it should be.

I would appreciate hearing other recommendations that folks might have for 
web hosts.

Thanks,
-KF





"Mark Rae [MVP]"  wrote in message 
news:OjefcS21HHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> "Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]"  
> wrote in message 
> news:9AF9718C-F06D-454D-8170-39FDA7840555@microsoft.com...
>
>>I am afraid that the solution here is to dump godaddy.com and find another
>> hoster. It didn't take me more than 10 minutes to dump them when I found 
>> out
>> I could not even make an HTTPWebRequest from the site I deployed due to 
>> their
>> ridiculous restrictions.
>
> Absolutely! I've never known any developer with a good word to say about 
> this ISP...
>
>
> -- 
> Mark Rae
> ASP.NET MVP
> http://www.markrae.net 
Date:Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:29:39 -0700   Author:  

Re: web hosting limits: ways in ASP.NET to allow connection to remote   
<kenfine@nospam.nospam> wrote in message 
news:ul6NxV31HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...


> I would appreciate hearing other recommendations that folks might have for 
> web hosts.


http://www.hostinguk.net


-- 
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Date:Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:59:22 +0100   Author:  

Google
 
Web dotnetnewsgroup.com


COPYRIGHT ?2005, EUROFRONT WORLDWIDE LTD., ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   Contact us