DotNetNewsgroup.com  
web access to complete list of Microsoft.NET newsgroups
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive  |  
 
  carried group
academic
adonet
aspnet
aspnet.announcements
aspnet.buildingcontrols
aspnet.caching
aspnet.datagridcontrol
aspnet.mobile
aspnet.security
aspnet.webcontrols
aspnet.webservices
assignment_manager
datatools
dotnet.distributed_apps
dotnet.general
dotnet.myservices
dotnet.nternationalization
dotnet.scripting
dotnet.security
dotnet.vjsharp
dotnet.vsa
dotnet.xml
dotnetfaqs
framework
framework.clr
framework.compactframework
framework.component_services
framework.controls
framework.databinding
framework.drawing
framework.enhancements
framework.interop
framework.odbcnet
framework.performance
framework.remoting
framework.sdk
framework.setup
framework.webservices
framework.windowsforms
framework.wmi
frwk.windowsforms.designtime
lang.csharp
lang.jscript
lang.vb
lang.vb.controls
lang.vb.data
lang.vb.upgrade
lang.vc
lang.vc.libraries
  
 
start date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:40:46 -0700,    posted on: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet        back       

Thread Index
  1    GaryDean am
          2    (Walter Wang [MSFT])


Enterprise Library number jumble   
I now have installed (from the same install) Enterprise Library - January 
2006 and Enterprise Library - June 2005.  The install for these two was 
called Enterprise Library for .Net 2.0.  (not Enterprise Library 2.0). I 
then discovered that there is an Enterprise Library 3.1 - May 2007.  So I 
want to install that because it is the latest.

The instructions, however, say that if I already have Enterprise Library 3.0 
installed, I must uninstall it before installing 3.1.  However the two 
versions I already have don't have a version number - they just say June 
2005 and January 2006 so I don't know if that is 3.0.

The instructions also say that I can go ahead and install Enterprise Library 
3.1 when "2.0" is already installed. I'm wondering if they mean "Enterprise 
Library 2.0" or "Enterprise Library for .Net 2.0" ??

The problem here is that Enterprise Library sometimes goes by the Month and 
year, sometimes it has a version number by itself, and sometimes it just 
says Enterprise Library for .Net 2.0"

All this time I'm trying to remember that the purpose of all this is to save 
me time.

Anyone understand this number jumble?

-- 
Regards,
Gary Blakely
Date:Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:40:46 -0700   Author:  

RE: Enterprise Library number jumble   
Hi Gary,

Please make sure you download the EntLib from Microsoft download site 
instead of CodePlex, the open source workspace for the project.

Although we released source code of EntLib on CodePlex, the purpose of it 
is to let community customize the EntLib to their own use. However, all 
downloads of EntLib on Microsoft site are created and maintained by 
Microsoft developers.

Please check following official EntLib downloads:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa480453.aspx

You will find following releases available:

Latest Release: Enterprise Library 3.1 C May 2007 (for .NET Framework 2.0 
and 3.0) 
Enterprise Library 3.0 C April 2007 (for .NET Framework 2.0 and 3.0) 
Earlier Release: Enterprise Library for .NET Framework 2.0, January 2006 
Earlier Release: Enterprise Library for .NET Framework 1.1, June 2005 


The reason that we keep all versions available is that:

1) There're many breaking changes for v1 to v2 due to .NET Framework 
changes.
2) Although we maintained most backward compatibility from v2 to v3, it's 
still not necessary to upgrade from v2 to v3, especially for those already 
largely incorporated v2 in their code, instead, they can get small patches 
accordingly. Therefore we still keep all versions available.

Hope this clarifies a bit. Let me know if there's anything else unclear.

Regards,
Walter Wang (wawang@online.microsoft.com, remove 'online.')
Microsoft Online Community Support

==================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
==================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Date:Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:24:58 GMT   Author:  

Google
 
Web dotnetnewsgroup.com


COPYRIGHT ?2005, EUROFRONT WORLDWIDE LTD., ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   Contact us