Hi,



Is there any issue with performance objects/counters exposed by CLR 
considering 32bit and 64bit  machines.



thanks and regards

user





"Robert"  wrote in message 
news:<OI#v5usvHHA.4640@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>...


> I played with these a bit a few months ago..

>

> They are character by character identical to what perfmon gives you.

> IE - pick some counters in perfmon and the categories/counters

> are then plugged in, exactly the same, into your code.

>

> So, I think there are no changes, other than whatever the 
> NT/Win2k/XP/Vista

> teams have added to the base OS.

>

> HTH

>

> > hmm, that type of information may be available in the release notes of 
> > the

> > framework but I'm not aware of any single site where this information

> > resides.

> >

> > -- 

> > Regards,

> > Alvin Bruney

> > ------------------------------------------------------

> > Shameless author plug

> > Excel Services for .NET is coming...

> > https://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/10933.aspx

> > OWC Black Book www.lulu.com/owc

> > Professional VSTO 2005 - Wrox/Wiley

> >

> >

> > "user" <spam@@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> > news:uN%23ReLivHHA.5104@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> >> Hi,

> >>

> >> I would like to know that are there any changes or any sort of

> >> modifications or definition change for performance counters excposed by

> >> .net clr w.r.t dot net versions 1.1/2.0/3.0

> >>

> >> regards

> >> ~

> >>

> >

> >

>

>

> Is there any issue with performance objects/counters exposed by CLR 
> considering 32bit and 64bit  machines.


Not that I know of.  All of my machines are 64 bit.